Meeting of the House Financial Services Committee
Image via Wikipedia

Usually when we think about getting more women into top political spots, we think about encouraging women to run for elective office; however, the behind-the-scenes players are just as important, especially when it comes to writing the legislation and directing strategies.  But, Politico.com reports that women are still in the minority in the top Congressional staff positions. As Siobhan Bennett of the Women’s Campaign Forum said:

Corporations and law firms are setting targets for the number of women they hire, which begs the question, does it make sense for the Hill to come up with targets? After the ‘year of the woman’ and the ascension of Nancy Pelosi, we’re still being left in the dust.

But the problem isn’t so much that women aren’t being hired on the Hill. In fact, Politico reports that tons of women are filling  lower and mid-level positions like staff assistant, scheduler, and executive assistant. These positions can certainly be the starting point on the road to the top, but consider that the average executive assistant on the Hill makes about $50,000 a year and the average pay for a Chief of Staff is about $134,000 and you can see how that that might be one long road to travel if there’s little support or encouragement to move up the ranks. And, that lack of support seems to be the main problem women face in achieving top spots like Chief of Staff or legislative director.

Encouraging women to get involved isn’t so much the problem, but getting them to stay on the job. Politico reports that flexible schedules and shortened maternity leave policies make it difficult for women to pursue their ambitions while raising a family. Twenty-seven percent of House offices offer one month or less for maternity leave and two percent of House offices don’t offer their staffers any paid maternity leave at all (who are those members of Congress?). Flexible leave is not offered by 42 percent of House offices.

 Women who do succeed on the Hill work in offices that provide flexible hours and generous paid maternity leave. Surprisingly, a member of Congress who has these policies in place is not woman, but a man–Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD). Ruppersberger’s top four staffers are all working mothers and his office gives them eight weeks paid maternity leave, flexible hours, and the option to work from home. Sounds like my dream job. Ruppersberger will have my resume, stat! 

Of course, having other women at the top can do a lot to encourage other women to stay on the job, climb the ranks and change the culture.  Politico quoted a former chief counsel for Nancy Pelosi, who credited her position in the Congresswoman’s office to female bosses and senior staffers who urged to go for the higher level jobs.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Pap Smears Are Magical

by jen on April 16, 2010

Education and awareness are wonderful things.  I think it’s great that Kathy Griffin is raising cervical cancer awareness by getting a pool side Pap smear on her show, “My Life on the D-List,” but I’ve often wondered just how far awareness can go in saving lives when we’re talking about a test that requires not just initiative, but money (or rather, health insurance). Here’s the thing: telling women how important Pap smears are in fighting cervical cancer is all well and good.  Demystifying the test for some women is even better.  But, what about getting all women into the gyno’s office and paying for that test?   

I’ve been a little obsessed recently with how to pay for things that I used to take for granted. This is because, despite being armed with a master’s degree and a cushy middle class background, I’ve been unemployed since completing the grad program. Out of all the things I used to take for granted; happy hours with frozen margaritas, premium cable, and shoe shopping as a way to destress; the thing I miss the most  is the once a year visit to the gynecologist mostly paid for by insurance. Freelancing is great (and I love working from home), but it does not come with health benefits. I’m sure there are plenty of other American women in the same situation: women who know how important it is to get screened for cancers, but can’t pay for it.

Awareness is the first step, but making it feasible to get women into those stirrups is imperative. I was doing some research on cervical cancer statistics and I came across this interesting tidbit from Cervical Cancer.org:  since 1989 the United Kingdom has provided free Pap tests to all women aged 25 to 64.  I know that all that socialist mumbo jumbo would surely destroy America, but geez, that’s how you save lives.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Kicking Ass and Taking Names

by jen on March 27, 2010

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States Hou...
Image via Wikipedia

Happy belated birthday Speaker Pelosi!  I apologize for missing your 70th birthday, but I’m glad that DailyKos was there to send you 2600 roses.  I hope someday I get to do something as awesome as marshaling health care reform, so that I too get a whole bunch of roses from a political blog.

Madam Speaker, for your birthday I want to thank you for teaching me two valuable lessons about tenacity and persistance.  Writing a thesis on you was not easy.  I analyzed you and reanalyzed you.  Sometimes it seemed like you owned my soul.  I thought of you as a frenemy, but I would do it all over again.  Hell, I’d write a dissertation on you.  Getting the chance to contribute something to the study of political women kept me going for that year.  I think many women could learn so much from you about leadership, and well, kicking ass and taking names.  And, in our youth-obsessed culture, you’ve shown that people can have a rich and exciting career no matter your age.

People can say rude things about women, especially about our looks and how we dress.  One of the things I learned while studying your career was how much our appearance is a damned if you do damned if you don’t situation.  But you embrace it and use fashion like armor–you always look classy and in control.  Botox shmotox, who cares!  You pushed through legislation that really matters to regular people.  The haters (err, Republicans) can say what they want, calling this Armeggedon or socialism, but we know that 50 years from now people are going to look back on this time as the advent of good change for millions of Americans.  Social Security, Medicare, now health care reform.  People probably won’t remember what you looked like when you made history.  As the Los Angeles Times recently wrote about you:

 No speaker in the past century has played such a key role in enacting major reforms. No speaker since Henry Clay, who wielded the gavel in the 1810s and ’20s, has had so great an effect on American life.

Seriously, who remembers what Henry Clay wore when he wielded the gavel?  Considering that he was kicking ass and taking names in the early 1800s, I’m guessing that he, like most people back then, didn’t bathe every day.  I bet he smelled.

Thank you for seeing it through and making it happen.  It’s not perfect and I still think there should be Medicare for all, but for now this will do.  Let’s just hope that future leaders can use their hearts and their heads when making public policy.

Happy Birthday!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Sarah Palin addressing the Republican National...
Image via Wikipedia

TLC is quickly becoming the channel I love to hate.  Move over Lifetime and Fox News because TLC is serving up one more hot, steaming pile of a circus freak show family.  The former Alaska Governor and Republican vice presidential hopeful finally got her “reality” show and it’s slated to be an eight-part documentary.  The natural beauty of Alaska will be brought to us by Palin on the same network that delivered to us the dissolution of the John and Kate Gosselin marriage.

Sarah Palin’s Alaska will be executive-produced by Survivor’s Mark BurnettIn a press release, Discovery Communications CEO Peter Liguori said the series will “reveal Alaska’s powerful beauty as it has never been filmed, and as told by one of the state’s proudest daughters.”  And I wonder, will this powerful beauty be revealed from a helicopter as seen through the  view-finder of  a big ole hunting gun?  Nah.  I’m sure we’ll see sweeping vistas, lots of mountains, snow, wild animals, and an oil rig.  I’m betting on scenes of Palin making moose stew, wearing yellow waders and throwing around fishing nets, and showing off her bear skin rug.  I’m sure we’ll see plenty of former first dude Todd, little Tripp, and Trig,  Track, abstinence crusader Bristol, Piper, and Willow (the one who threw David Letterman for a loop).  And I’ll be there in front of the TV like a moth to the flame.

The poor Duggar family really will have some wild and crazy family competition now. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Shales Disses Amanpour

by jen on March 23, 2010

BEVERLY HILLS, CA - OCTOBER 30:  CNN?s chief i...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

My heart skipped a beat last week when the news  came out that CNN Correspondent Christiane Amanpour is going to be the new host of ABC’s This Week.  When I was a kid, I wanted to grow up to be just like Christiane Amanpour because she had a cool job and a cool accent.  But Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales, ever the curmudgeon, does not agree.  He thinks there are far more deserving men for the job. 

Shales’ argument:  the Sunday morning talk shows are all about domestic American politics and Amanpour is deficient in that area because she spends most of her time reporting on complex foreign affairs issues.  And you know, foreign affairs rarely, if ever, creeps into any political discussion.  Really, when has a politician ever made war a campaign issue?  Oh dear Tom Shales, haven’t you ever heard of a transferable skill?  I’m willing to bet that interviewing warlords more than prepares you for the rigors of interviewing Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner. 

Shales’ evidence:  some people don’t like Amanpour.  ABC news insiders are angry about the decision to make Amanpour the host of This Week.  The conservative Media Research Center says she’s a liberal.  There’s a Facebook group outraged over her supposed anti-Israel bias.   

Shales’ solution:  ABC News president David Westin should “withdraw Amanpour’s name and come up with a new ‘nominee’ for the job.”

Okay, maybe this is not so much about shattering the glass-ceiling, considering that Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer, Gwen Ifill and Rachel Maddow all host their own shows.  But Shales’ argument really only extends as far as other people don’t like her and that he thinks there are more deserving men for the job.  Shales’ article reminds me of some of the arguments made against Sonja Sotomayor becoming a Supreme Court Justice:  she’s not good enough; surely there are more deserving people; she’s biased.  Shales offers up two white men (Nightline’s Terry Moran and White House Correspondent Jake Tapper) who are far more deserving because they are political insiders.  And that goes to my next point, which is that perhaps it’s best to move away from the political insiders, who are mostly white guys.  A little diversity in the types of questions that are asked and the types of discussions we have in the mainstream media can not be a bad thing.  Of course, some will argue that Amanpour is pretty establishment, coming from CNN, but I’m talking more diversity in terms of career background and the questions she might ask on the big issues of the day.

Then again maybe I still resent Shales for his comment about Katie Couric looking chubby in the white suit she wore the night she debuted as the CBS Nightly News anchor.  Shales, get thyself a mirror!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

HOLLYWOOD - MARCH 07:  (EDITORS NOTE: NO ONLIN...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Yet again I suck.  I was going to write this in-depth article about Kathryn Bigelow shattering the glass ceiling for women in Hollywood by being the first woman to receive the best directing Oscar on the eve of International Women’s Day, but now that I’ve spent most of the day reworking a resume, I’m spent.  So congratulations Kathryn Bigelow!  And a big suck it to everyone and anyone (Ahem, Ryan Seacrest) who felt it was necessary, exciting, or cool to comment on her being in the same category as her ex-husband, James Cameron, who directed Avatar.  Did you think that the story about the first woman winning a directing Oscar needed some sex and excitement?

Anyhoo, I promise better posts to come.  But first I’m going to actually watch The Hurt Locker.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Love and Marriage, D.C. Style

by jen on March 3, 2010

WASHINGTON - MARCH 03:  Jonathan Howard (L) ki...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

First of all, I’ve been a bad bad blogger, but I have an excuse.  A very very good excuse.  Now that I’m a newly minted bearer of a Master’s degree, I’ve been working over time to get a job–err, a career.  After all, that’s what I went to grad school for.  So, I’ve been sending out resumes and cover letters like it’s my job–an unpaid job.

Now that I’ve gotten that out of the way, my excuse for being a 30 year-old single woman has been that I’m standing in solidarity with the gays and that I won’t get married until they can get married.  Now I need a more compelling excuse because Washington D.C. has just shown it’s heart by legalizing gay marriage and people were at the D.C. Courthouse today making it official.  I’m a fan of love and happiness, so I extend my warmest wishes to all the glowy couples.  Now if only the Westboro Baptist Church losers would find something else to do with their spare time, like saving their hatred for something genuinely hateful like racism or homophobia.

Yay!  Love! 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Will You Be My Republican Valentine?

by jen on February 9, 2010

This Valentine’s Day get your sweetie something they can’t filibuster, deny, or block:  A GOP Valentine’s Day card!  This Hallmark holiday, Michael Steele’s crew is offering a romantic gesture in the form of an E-Card so you can tell your favorite Republican, Democrat, or Independent how much the Democrats are ruining this country– and your sex life if you really think this is a good idea.

Of the 18 cards you can choose from, I think this one comes the closest to being slightly amusing:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Speaking as a former teenage girl, I’m beginning to think society, the media, and the world hates adolescent girls.  Crap is marketed to them (Miley Cyrus, Twilight, the Jonas Brothers, Emo); they’re abused (Precious); they’re coveted by dirty old men (Lolita, Britney Spears); and when they’re not having heart palpitations over Robert Pattinson, they’re taking over college campuses and creating a boy crisis in education, because as you know, if girls succeed boys must fail.  And now the latest in teenage girl hateorade:  Lifetime network’s “The Pregnancy Pact.”

Aside from the Raspberry Award worthy acting and the fact that I lost two hours of my life by watching it, “The Pregnancy Pact” is rife with teenage girls who are silly, naive liars trying to trap their boyfriends by getting pregnant.  Oh yeah, and in a lame-o plot twist we find out that the liberal blogger (Thora Birch) who goes back to her highschool to document the spike in teen pregnancies lied to her super-sweet ex-boyfriend about having an abortion.  That bitch!  Lifetime even took some creative license (if you can call it that) and changed the facts on which the movie was based.  In reality, the Gloucester, MA girls did not have a pact to get pregnant.  The pregnancies were a coincidence.  Way to go Lifetime!  Is this television for women or television for brain-dead women? 

Admittedly, I sometimes ironically watch Lifetime for the pregnant-teen movies because nothing is funnier than a bad movie, but I’m confused as to why a network that purports to care about girls, their bodies, and their choices constantly depicts them as the last girl on earth you’d want for a best friend.  I wholeheartedly support movies that are meant to spark serious debate about teen pregnancy, contraception, abortion, and teen-parent communication, but please, please make the movie good, honest, and a little bit more nuanced.  I’d like to see a movie that is not the pregnancy-for-plot-advancement of “Juno” or the hilarity of peter pans becoming men in  “Knocked Up.”  

Considering the latest news about the increase in teen pregnancies we need to come up with a better way to talk to kids about sex and baby-making that goes beyond Sarah and Bristol Palin hawking abstinence on the cover of In Touch, distributing condoms, or locking girls in their bedrooms until they’re 70.  I suspect a real solution would mean abandoning ideology and working together to teach all girls and boys that there’s more to life than sex–you know, like having a future that can be filled with education, careers, love, and yes, children.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Gawker is reporting that John Edwards has a sex tape.  I’m just wondering:  why make a visual chronicle of yourself having sex when you are a) famous b) running for president c) all of the above?  Is this something that lots of people do?  I’m thinking we need another Kinsey report sex survey because I’m worried that I’m the only person on the planet who hasn’t done this.  Get on it Indiana University!

Also, Gawker says that Edwards has a certain body part almost as big as his ego.  I’m asking for a moratorium on all politician sex scandals for at least 10 years.  The past decade has had enough.

Sources: John Edwards Has a Sex Tape – John Edwards – Gawker.

{ 0 comments }

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes